Home · Second opinion in Sweden · Radiologist or orthopaedist
Radiologist or orthopaedist — who should review your scan?
This page answers one question: which specialist should review your scan. If what you want to know is what your MRI report means and whether the findings explain your symptoms, that is a different question and it is answered on the MRI results page. Here the subject is the choice between two services that are done by different specialists and cost a consultation each if you pick wrong.
Quick answer
A specialist in radiology re-reads the images and produces a new written report — this is what you want if you suspect something was missed or over-called on the scan itself. An orthopaedist assesses what the findings mean for your symptoms, your function and your treatment options, combining the images with your history and a physical examination. Most patients who ask for a second opinion on their MRI want the second of these: they do not doubt what is on the scan, they doubt the conclusion being drawn from it.
The division of labour
| Specialist in radiology | Orthopaedist | |
|---|---|---|
| Answers | What is visible on the images | What the findings mean for your symptoms and treatment |
| Works from | The image files and the clinical question in the referral | Images, report, history and physical examination |
| Produces | A new written radiological report | A clinical assessment and a recommendation |
| Ask for this when | You suspect the scan was misread | You doubt the conclusion drawn from the scan |
How to tell which you need
Put your doubt into a sentence. If it comes out as "I think there is something there they did not mention", you want a re-reading. If it comes out as "they say this tear is why my knee hurts and I am not convinced", you want a clinical assessment.
If it comes out as "I do not understand what any of this means", you want the clinical assessment too — and it is worth saying so plainly when you arrange it, because a consultation booked to explain is used differently from one booked to decide.
How Andrabedomning.se fits in
Andrabedomning.se is an independent Swedish patient guidance service. You describe your situation in a request — in English — and a person reads it and replies, normally within one working day, with information about relevant specialist contact. If we cannot help, you get an explanation of why and where to turn instead. We do not diagnose or provide medical care. Records go directly to the care provider, never to us.
Sending a request is free and commits you to nothing. If we can coordinate a suitable specialist contact, two amounts are disclosed to you in writing before anything is booked: our coordination fee (samordningsavgift), which is our only source of revenue, and the specialist's fee, which is set by the care provider and paid directly to them. We take no commissions or referral fees from specialists or clinics. How it works in full →
Andrabedomning.se coordinates the contact. The medical assessment is made by the specialist and care provider you choose.
Frequently asked questions about who should review a scan
Which specialist should I ask for a second opinion on a scan?
It depends on which part you doubt. If you suspect the images were misread — something missed, something over-called — the answer is a formal re-reading by a specialist in radiology, producing a new written report. If you accept the report but doubt the conclusion drawn from it, the answer is a clinical assessment by the treating specialty, which for a joint or spinal problem is an orthopaedist.
Does the radiologist know what my symptoms are?
Only what the referral told them, which is often a single line. A radiologist describes what is visible on the images and relates it to the clinical question they were given. They do not examine you. That is not a limitation of the specialty — it is the division of labour, and it is why a report alone cannot establish that a finding is causing your pain.
Can I get a re-reading without a new scan?
Yes. A re-reading works from the existing images, which is the point of it. You need the image files themselves rather than only the report, since the whole exercise is looking at the original images again. Request the files from the provider that performed the examination and ask whether they can be transferred directly to the receiving provider.
Do radiologists often disagree with each other?
Some variation between readers is normal and expected in imaging, particularly for findings that sit near a threshold — the size of a tear, the degree of narrowing, whether a change is degenerative or acute. That is precisely why a re-reading is a meaningful service rather than a formality. It is also why a small difference between two reports is not usually evidence that either was wrong.
Which one do most patients actually need?
In practice, the clinical assessment. Most people who say they want a second opinion on their MRI are not disputing what is on the images — they want to know whether it explains their symptoms and whether the proposed treatment follows from it. That is an orthopaedic question, not a radiological one, and asking for the wrong one costs a consultation.
Can one assessment cover both?
Sometimes. An orthopaedic specialist reviewing your case will look at the images as well as the report, and may raise a discrepancy if they see one. What they do not produce is a new formal radiological report — that is a distinct service from a specialist in radiology. If you specifically want a documented re-reading, ask for it in those terms.
Sources
- Brinjikji et al., "Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations", American Journal of Neuroradiology (2015) — the prevalence of degenerative findings in people without symptoms: 33 studies, 3,110 asymptomatic individuals, with disc degeneration rising from 37% at age 20 to 96% at age 80 and disc bulge from 30% to 84% across the same span.
- 1177 — Magnetkameraundersökning — what an MRI examination involves and how the result reaches the patient.
- 1177 — Din journal — access to imaging reports and the route to requesting the image files themselves.
- Patient Act (patientlagen 2014:821), chapter 9, section 1 — the right to choose a publicly funded outpatient provider in any region for either assessment.
Editorially produced by Andrabedomning.se from the primary sources above. Sources last checked: 4 August 2026.
Related pages
- Unsure about an MRI result
Why a finding is not the same as an explanation.
- Getting your images, not just the report
The files a re-reading needs, and how to request them.
- Orthopaedic second opinion
The clinical assessment most patients actually want.
- Before back surgery
Where the distinction between finding and cause matters most.
Not sure which review you need?
Describe your situation in a few sentences and tell us which assessment or recommendation you have already received. Sending a request is free. If we can coordinate a suitable specialist contact, our coordination fee and the specialist's separate fee are disclosed in writing before you decide whether to book.
In an emergency, call 112. For non-urgent medical advice, call 1177.